Categorisation Of Forums, Hardware is hardware |
|
|
|
|
Replies
|
Tue 5 Nov 2002, 14:35
|
Webmaster
Group: Admin
Posts: 3,204
Joined: 29-Oct 00
From: Sommieres - FR
Member No.: 11
|
i agree with u kaboom, creating new forums also invite people to post more (that's one of the points) Another point is to split existing general categories into more specific categories: the choice is not motivated by pure logic, because, as stated buserror, they would always be cases where gears interacts... but if we stay with this 'logic' point of view, we can't split the current 'messy' categories. We (the moderator team and I) think about it a long time before reorganizing the french part of the forums, to get a balance between logic/new motivating forums and categories split (decided by number of post about specific subjects, not logic), and it seems to work, at least not that bad. Here is the list (better descriptions would help a lot): * beginners: all newbie questions, whatever they are (a place were moderator will move newbie recurrent questions) * plug-ins and virtual instruments a lot of posts are related to that) not OS specific * All other softwares under OS 9 * All other softwares under OS X * Interface/card audio+MIDI related problems: (a lot of posts are related to that) not platform specific, software related or not * Mac Hardware and periphericals: CPU, RAM, Fans, power, Harddrive, CDR, etc...hardware only * Synth, samplers, instruments and sounds: even if connected with software (if gear specific). * Studio hardware: mixers, effects, compressor, monitors, headphones, wires....hardware only * Theory and technical: mixing, recording, mastering, digital audio, surround, technology, harmony, etc... * Developpment: (Busserror's forum) for developpers only * OpenBar: for the rest We know there will be cases were the posting choice could balance between two forums, but no system is perfect: at leat this sheme seems to work in most cases and splits things according to the current posts content. Clear and precises titles and descriptions will certainly help to make this simpliest: May be you, the english-native members could help to write it clearer. Sorry for my (uncorrected) english
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Presto Categorisation Of Forums Wed 30 Oct 2002, 12:40 damann whilst appreciating the fact that small print does... Thu 31 Oct 2002, 03:21 lepetitmartien QUOTE Yeah, agreed! one should never post anyt... Thu 31 Oct 2002, 14:19 Soif We have been working hard with lpm and other team ... Thu 31 Oct 2002, 14:28 lepetitmartien The problem with newbies we are really aware of it... Fri 1 Nov 2002, 14:36 Presto OK
Let's continue with (non-francophone!... Fri 1 Nov 2002, 19:17 BusError Well, for me, it had always been rather clear from... Fri 1 Nov 2002, 20:38 lepetitmartien First OS9 is not, because Stevy said it obsolette,... Sat 2 Nov 2002, 00:13 lepetitmartien …mhhmm forgot…
the subject of the hardware forum ... Sat 2 Nov 2002, 00:20 Presto Thanks Damann and BusError
I don't believe w... Sat 2 Nov 2002, 14:40 Presto Boll**ks!
Its coming fast. If you don... Sat 2 Nov 2002, 19:59 BusError I think the new names for the french forums are pr... Sun 3 Nov 2002, 10:31 Presto Welcome BusError. Thanks.
We can propose a new a... Mon 4 Nov 2002, 16:47 kaboombahchuck Well, I'm having a bit of trouble with what al... Tue 5 Nov 2002, 13:08 kaboombahchuck Well, from what I can tell so far...looks pretty g... Wed 6 Nov 2002, 00:10
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|