![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 31-Jan 06 From: Plantation - US Member No.: 76,083 ![]() |
another question from a mac newbie..... to run Protools, which would be considered more desirable: dual 1 gig processors, or something like a single 1.67? by the way, are there any issues with compatibility with the quicksilvers? seems every time i read more into the digidesign website there are more compatibility problems to look out for. thanks....!
|
|
|
![]() |
Replies
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Moderator ![]() Group: Team Posts: 370 Joined: 19-Mar 03 From: Umeå - SE Member No.: 14,645 ![]() |
I would go for the dual 1G quicksilver I think. The speed of the bus in the computer would also be important here.
(perhaps other persons here can give you better advice) I dont use Pro Tools I use DP and have zero problems. (of course my new G5 is a "double-kernel/core" cpu - in effect a dual G5) Digital Performer at least is - and I would imagine Pro Tools as well - dualprocessor aware - and can use two processors to divvy up processes threads and other tasks. ( I DO NOT ACTUALLY KNOW if Pro Tools has this capability check their website ) Cheers: Dixiechicken -------------------- ==================
Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================ |
|
|
Posts in this topic
![-](style_images/en/to_post.gif)
![-](style_images/en/to_post_no_children.gif)
![-](style_images/en/to_post.gif)
![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
![](https://static.440net.net/skins/macmusic/images/spacer.gif)