Tascam Us-122, Review of new USB device |
|
|
|
Fri 1 Aug 2003, 14:15
|
Maniac Member
Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705
|
A few people have been mentioning the Tascam US-122 lately, so I thought I'd post a review of the unit that I've just written for a music magazine. Might help someone thinking of buying one. Any further questions are very welcome. Are you sitting comfortably? Then we'll begin... The US-122 is the latest fruit of the Tascam/Frontier development partnership and is the logical successor to the US-428 and US-224 models. Where these sought to act as both interfaces and mini control surfaces for sequencers, the US-122 is a straightforward portable USB device. Put simply, it is a two-input, two-output 24-bit AD/DA audio/MIDI interface, offering a respectable proliferation of ins and outs. There are two balanced XLR mic inputs; two 1/4” balanced line inputs (switchable to high-impedance unbalanced inputs for direct connection of any hi-Z source, such as a guitar, bass or synth); TRS inserts on each input channel for effects processors; impedance matching and a 16-channel Midi interface. Output is via a pair of unbalanced line outputs on RCA connectors, although regrettably there is no digital option, either in or out. A separate headphone output with dedicated volume knob is provided, along with the master volume knob and a direct monitoring knob. The unit is entirely USB powered and provides phantom power to the two XLR sockets for use with condenser mics. Construction is solid, the reassuringly chunky design and rubberised mid-section promising to withstand a few knocks. As the US-122 lends itself to portable use, this is an important issue. Its dimensions are also a boon, measuring just 149 x 60 x 196mm (W/H/D) and weighing just over 2lb (925g). Installation of the tiny 5Mb driver was easy, the only caveat being that OS X owners must be running at least OS X 10.2.3. The driver also works in OS 9 and the device will support ASIO, Sound Manager, CoreAudio, CoreMIDI, OMS and Free MIDI. A version of Cubasis for Mac is bundled with the package, although this only works in OS 9. The US-122 Manager contains settings for Audio Safety Buffer (1-5ms) and the USB Bandwidth Usage dialogue, an audio-disable function for when you just want to run MIDI and timing is crucial. A guitar tuner is also included. Sample rates of either 44.1 or 48Khz are possible, with a resolution of either 16 or 24-bits. These and other parameters (such as overall gain levels) can be set in Audio and Midi Setup in OS X. In operation, using the US-122 is a no-brainer. Plug in your instrument or mic, move the mic/line or guitar switch accordingly, select phantom power if required and adjust the Left or Right channel levels as necessary, using the signal indicators as a guide. There is only one light to show the presence of an audio signal (when the level exceeds –37dBFS) and only one overload indicator (which lights at –2.5dBFS), so it’s something of a challenge to pinpoint the optimum recording level. Using your DAW’s channel-level indicators is advisable. The latency of the US-122’s hardware input monitor is advertised at “always less than 1.5ms”, but you can avoid the latency issue completely while overdubbing live signals by using the Direct switch. There is also a Mono switch which folds the two direct monitor stereo channels to mono. You can record and playback two audio channels simultaneously, although slightly disappointing is the fact that the manual advises against recording mic and line signals simultaneously as the signal level is summed and the two are likely to interfere with one another. The sound quality achieved with the US-122 is of a professional quality and the unit delivers a nice loud signal on playback – some USB audio devices need cranking right up to get anything out of them. MIDI operation was also straightforward. Bear in mind that the US-122 is only a USB device, though, and that the limits of the USB’s data-carrying capacity generally prohibits playback of anything greater than 16 audio tracks. One improvement we would suggest is that the dials could do with a coloured strip on top to better indicate their position. At present, there is only a groove cut into the plastic, but as all the knobs are silver on a silver machine, it’s hard to identify settings at a glance or in low light conditions. Apart from that, if you need to capture analogue sources and are in the market for a small, portable recording and MIDI solution, this machine fits the bill. As a portable recording solution for capturing ideas on the hoof, for recording demos, gigs, rehearsals or any other type of location recording, the US-122 is a good bet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
|
Fri 2 Sep 2005, 17:24
|
Maniac Member
Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705
|
Woodenbird: I don't know what to tell you. I don't have a 122 to hand, so I can't check it out. Yeah, seems strange, though. Fooling around in AMS worked for my FireBox and my 828. Beauty_speed: I think there are many satisfied Mac/122 owners. You may or may not prove to be one of them in time. No one can predict the future Got any friends with a Mac? Could you load your 122 Mac drivers up on it and test it? I didn't have any problems actually using the 122 on my G3 iBook, but I haven't had it for nearly two years now, so I can't speak for Tascam's current position regarding support for Macs and its whole US range of interfaces. To be honest, the future of audio (on any platform) is FireWire (or at least USB 2.0). Interfaces are now so cheap and USB so slow in comparison, I wouldn't be surprised if Tascam were working on a new FireWire product. Or they might have abandoned the whole market altogether in the face of established, superior competition.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
rickenbacker Tascam Us-122 Fri 1 Aug 2003, 14:15 xingu Nice review there. The only thing I would like to... Fri 1 Aug 2003, 17:28 T1mon Thx for the review and for telling us the 'fiz... Fri 1 Aug 2003, 23:31 natural selection hello rickenbacker,
you seem to be an expert so t... Tue 14 Oct 2003, 05:57 rickenbacker Hey, Natural Selection,
Well, I'm no expert, ... Tue 14 Oct 2003, 14:45 boze rick-
could you say anything more about that ... Tue 14 Oct 2003, 17:36 rickenbacker Hey boze,
The summed input issue is basically tha... Wed 15 Oct 2003, 16:38 boze thx rick-
yeah, i've already been pricing used... Wed 15 Oct 2003, 17:11 billmeyer Just bought myself a US 122 because I was looking ... Tue 21 Oct 2003, 06:13 jebbels Hi Rick
I've been considering buying the tasca... Wed 22 Oct 2003, 15:43 xingu You won't be able to run the OEM Cubasis (or a... Wed 22 Oct 2003, 17:54 huwthom I thought the purpose of OS Classic was to enable ... Fri 24 Oct 2003, 16:36 jebbels I got a suggestion yesterday from a friend that se... Fri 24 Oct 2003, 16:50 boze huwthom and jebbels-
booting into 9.2 (whether by ... Fri 24 Oct 2003, 17:15 xingu QUOTE (jebbels @ Oct 24 2003, 10:50)at least ... Fri 24 Oct 2003, 19:21 fisken Hi.
I just got my Tascam U-122.
I'm a PC user,... Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:03 xingu Back when the Tascam forums were still up, I don... Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:08 IMNiles QUOTE (rickenbacker @ Oct 15 2003, 15:38)The ... Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:41 tas538cam Is there somebody also having problems with latenc... Sat 29 Nov 2003, 20:37 Oakland Stroke I have been watching this thread for awhile. Altho... Sat 13 Dec 2003, 00:40 rafisaar QUOTE (tas538cam @ Nov 29 2003, 21:37)when I ... Wed 17 Dec 2003, 08:16 harsh hey rick
i just bought a tascam us 122 and i... Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:21 socatevoli i've had the us-122 for about a year in a half... Fri 15 Jul 2005, 03:10 woodenbird hi,
i apologize in advance for the general naivet... Tue 30 Aug 2005, 23:25 banevt I don't have Logic Pro or Tiger but when I run... Wed 31 Aug 2005, 01:16 rickenbacker What about Audio MIDI Setup in the Utilities folde... Thu 1 Sep 2005, 16:26 woodenbird yeah, tried the ams to no avail. not sure quite wh... Thu 1 Sep 2005, 20:01 beauty_speed hi everyone,
let me start by saying i´m very glad... Thu 1 Sep 2005, 23:40
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|