MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
> Apple goes Intel. Why?, Apple
_news_
post Mon 6 Jun 2005, 20:42
Post #1





Visitors







Comments about:

Apple goes Intel. Why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
coldharbour
post Tue 7 Jun 2005, 13:07
Post #2


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 178
Joined: 14-Mar 05
From: -
Member No.: 62,351




QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 11:35)
Just as we couldn't run OS9 music apps under Classic in OSX, we won't be able to run OSX PPC music apps under Rosetta in OSXwintel. We will have to upgrade again, and wait for softdevs to make "Rosetta-carbonized" versions.

It's not Rosetta, it's Universal Binaries that'll be the answer. It's not a matter of "carbonizing", it's just a matter of recompiling.

Recompiling is not a major task but I'm sure some discontinued software and legacy products will not end up running on x86. I don't see that as a big problem. That happened with OS9 -> OSX transition as well and we've survived.

But I agree, it causes a bit of stress. If I buy a new x86 Mac I don't want to pay Apple anything extra to get my Logic Pro 7 running on it. And it won't run on Rosetta, I want the recompiled and optimized version and I want it for free. And I don't want to hear about 3rd party plug-ins not working or not being compiled.

We'll see how it goes. But looking at the big picture, I think moving on to Intel was a great strategic move from Apple.

QUOTE
A side note on rosetta, the emulator of PPC code to run on x86 (from Apple developer documentation)

Is it possible to get a straight URL to that document?

QUOTE (chidders @ Jun 7 2005, 11:48)
I have a G5, and I'm looking forward to many years of good service out of it. That's one of the reasons I bought a Mac. It does me proud now, and I can't see what will stop it working when the new INTEL based ones come out.


It doesn't stop working, but you'll just have to hope that all the software you need is being released as universal binaries for years to come - not only compiled for x86 architecture. Steve Jobs or anybody can not guarrantee that.

This post has been edited by coldharbour: Tue 7 Jun 2005, 13:11
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- news   Apple goes Intel. Why?   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 20:42
- - BobbiStyle   Hi Peeps Had a Mac since 1987. Always for Muzak.....   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 20:42
- - vaal   Everyone needs to relax, it's going to be just...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:07
- - BobbiStyle   Hi Vaal I agree about the IBM "lack", w...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:24
- - maxryzone   can someone explain in clear terms what this all m...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:31
- - vaal   No, absolutely nothing is wasted, it won't aff...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 22:12
- - Jsegura   Apple cannot marry with anybody. If IBM, that by t...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 23:02
- - lepetitmartien   I didn't put everything into the news, I tried...   Mon 6 Jun 2005, 23:25
- - indebttome   Let's remember this, as well - although OSX is...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:13
- - abcdaniel   this is CRAP! Longevity, come on! it won...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:15
- - lepetitmartien   Just wrote something really stupid, it'll run ...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:19
- - abcdaniel   Yeah, really, f*** it. New versions, new versions,...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 06:05
- - vaal   QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 00:05)At this ...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 08:30
- - abcdaniel   Isn't mr Steve known for being a bit** to work...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 10:25
- - coldharbour   Yeah well, at the moment PPC is looking pretty goo...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 11:27
- - abcdaniel   QUOTE As Steve said, it won't be nothing like ...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 12:35
- - chidders   Er... Am I missing something? When this move to I...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 12:48
- - vaal   QUOTE (chidders @ Jun 7 2005, 06:48)Er... Am ...   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 14:40
- - abcdaniel   i've might have worked myself up a bit here......   Tue 7 Jun 2005, 18:15
- - lepetitmartien   The big problem we face is altivec, it'll need...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 00:31
- - coldharbour   QUOTE (lepetitmartien @ Jun 7 2005, 23:31)The...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 10:36
- - stratology   "- No one will be able to say macs are crap b...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:02
- - lepetitmartien   An interesting article on Ars Technica, not far fr...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:03
- - stratology   Ars Technica was always one of the best sources I ...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:18
- - jeffca   Hey, Guys! If you read between the lines of S...   Wed 8 Jun 2005, 19:15
- - lepetitmartien   It's clear Steve decided that enough was enoug...   Thu 9 Jun 2005, 03:12
- - lepetitmartien   here is the post of a friend on Gaygeeks.org QUOT...   Thu 9 Jun 2005, 19:30
- - lepetitmartien   And Apple posted in its news a link for the column...   Fri 10 Jun 2005, 16:23
- - abcdaniel   Oooh, then maybe OSX will go 64bit! And maybe ...   Sat 11 Jun 2005, 18:53
- - lepetitmartien   Uh, OS X is partly 64 bits, G5 are 64 bits (with a...   Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:48
- - abcdaniel   Yeah, I at least am approaching the limit where th...   Sun 12 Jun 2005, 08:20
- - lepetitmartien   The 64 bitness of an OS is at multiple levels, OS ...   Mon 13 Jun 2005, 01:39


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 1 Dec 2024, 04:33
- © 440 Forums 2011