MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> What Is Logic Missing?, Compared to Protools HD
opiepac
post Fri 18 Mar 2005, 19:40
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 14-Mar 05
From: Sunnyvale - US
Member No.: 62,384




I'm about to start using Logic 7 once I get my PowerMac. I'm wanting to use Logic mainly from the standpoint of audio recording (line in guitars, mic'd vocals and instruments). I'm not that interested in MIDI, virtual synths, loops, etc, but I may play around with them for something more than a click track before I record drums, and who knows, maybe I'll start to like some of that stuff.

I don't want to start any rumor/speculations on this forum, there's enough of that at Applenova, Macrumors, Logic Pro Forums, etc. But there is currently speculation of updates to Apple's audio software. Possibly a version update of Logic, possibly new or rebranded apps, ... whatever. Maybe they'll just make Logic work better with Tiger. I've heard some say that maybe Logic will focus on MIDI/synth/loop stuff and there will be a new program focused on Audio recording similar to Protools. Lots of speculation, but mostly fluff right now.

What I've heard is some people complaining about what Logic lacks in comparison to Protools. I am referring to the HD version only. It seems Protools is more focused on the audio recording side, similar to old studios, but also has hardware specifically made to reduce the load on the computer. That's about all I know of protools, other than having seen it used in a studio once.

Now for the real question:

Can anyone tell me what advantages Protools has in the audio recording realm over Logic (and vice versa). I'm not considering Protools, I just want to know what Logic lacks ... what features might be included in a later version, that kind of stuff. I'd like to know how Apple, maybe through user requests, could make Logic better.

I've also heard some claim the Logic codebase is old, and needs to be rewritten from the ground up. Any opinions on this?

Evan

(I'm not trying to start speculation or flamewars with this, just discussion)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
abcdaniel
post Sun 20 Mar 2005, 12:38
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 77
Joined: 30-Jul 03
From: Malmö - SE
Member No.: 22,159




For video and synching, I have no idea how either Logic or ProTools works. Isn´t Nuendo the greatest for mixed media sequencing? Just to complicate matters wink.gif But why are people never mentioning Steinberg Cubase or Nuendo anymore? They are pretty competent too!

There is a 30 day trial version of Logic on http://www.macmusic.org/news/view.php/lang/EN/id/2972/
Take it for a test drive and see if it is your cup of tea.

I think midi has become a lot better in ProTools with 6.7 release, but I don´t run that version, so i have no practical experience from it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Thu 12 Dec 2024, 00:17
- © MacMusic 1997-2008