Mac Mini --> Usb 2 Or Firewire 400? |
Tue 8 Feb 2005, 04:58
Post
#1
|
|
Rookie Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 21-Jan 05 From: East Lansing - US Member No.: 58,914 |
When looking for an audio input card of any sort for a Mac Mini should i look for a USB 2 device or a Firewire device? Frankly i'm not sure if there is much of a difference or which is faster.
Thanks -------------------- |
|
|
Replies
Wed 9 Feb 2005, 06:24
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 16-Jul 04 From: Queenstown - NZ Member No.: 47,017 |
There is a copy and post form one comparison
shane Question: Hold on...USB 2.0 is a 480 Mbps interface and FireWire is a 400 Mbps interface, how can FireWire be faster? Answer: Raw throughput rating numbers alone don't tell the whole story, as explained below. The throughput numbers would lead you to believe that USB 2.0 provides better performance. But, differences in the architecture of the two interfaces have a huge impact on the actual sustained "real world" throughput. And for those seeking high-performance, sustained throughput is what it's all about (reading and writing files to an external hard drive for example). Architecture - FireWire vs. USB 2.0 FireWire, built from the ground up for speed, uses a "Peer-to-Peer" architecture in which the peripherals are intelligent and can negotiate bus conflicts to determine which device can best control a data transfer USB 2.0 uses a "Master-Slave" architecture in which the computer handles all arbitration functions and dictates data flow to, from and between the attached peripherals (adding additional system overhead and resulting in slower, less-efficient data flow control) Performance Comparison - FireWire vs. USB 2.0 Read and write tests to the same IDE hard drive connected using FireWire and then USB 2.0 show: Read Test: 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0 Write Test: 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0 FireWire - Still the Performance King! As the performance comparison shown above confirms, FireWire remains the performance leader. And is the best choice for DV camcorders, digital audio and video devices, external hard drives, high-performance DVD burners and any other device that demands continuous high performance throughput. |
|
|
Posts in this topic
bcatcho Mac Mini --> Usb 2 Or Firewire 400? Tue 8 Feb 2005, 04:58
shaneblyth firewire 400 is considerably faster than USB 2.0 ... Tue 8 Feb 2005, 06:10
bcatcho Ah, i shall look fo rthat research, thanks. Tue 8 Feb 2005, 19:38
nickmonster if the card is firewire 800... then go with that o... Thu 10 Feb 2005, 08:22
shaneblyth yes 800 is faster BUT 400 is alot faster too.. but... Fri 11 Feb 2005, 06:19
_T2k_ QUOTE (shaneblyth @ Feb 11 2005, 00:19)yes 80... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 03:58
shaneblyth QUOTE (_T2k_ @ Feb 13 2005, 02:58)QUOTE (shan... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 07:30
lepetitmartien USB is overall bad at streaming situations and pse... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 15:59
dfxx Quote shaneblyth ,Feb 11 2005, 00:19 >>... Mon 14 Feb 2005, 15:37
shaneblyth firewire 400 is considerably faster than USB 2.0 ... Tue 8 Feb 2005, 06:10
bcatcho Ah, i shall look fo rthat research, thanks. Tue 8 Feb 2005, 19:38
nickmonster if the card is firewire 800... then go with that o... Thu 10 Feb 2005, 08:22
shaneblyth yes 800 is faster BUT 400 is alot faster too.. but... Fri 11 Feb 2005, 06:19
_T2k_ QUOTE (shaneblyth @ Feb 11 2005, 00:19)yes 80... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 03:58
shaneblyth QUOTE (_T2k_ @ Feb 13 2005, 02:58)QUOTE (shan... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 07:30
lepetitmartien USB is overall bad at streaming situations and pse... Sun 13 Feb 2005, 15:59
dfxx Quote shaneblyth ,Feb 11 2005, 00:19 >>... Mon 14 Feb 2005, 15:37
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: