MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
> Edirol Ua-20 Vs M-audio Audiophile 24/96 For Osx, unsure which budget card to get
chris72
post Wed 9 Apr 2003, 11:34
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 08-Apr 03
From: Taroona - AU
Member No.: 15,734




hi,

I am tossing up between buying either a edirol ua-20 vs m-audio audiophile 24/96 for OSX,as a busget recording solution, i only want to record guitar tracks one at a time from an amp modeller (v-amp2) and was wondering if anyone had a suggestion as which way to go? I am using reason & recycle but will need to use some sort of OSX software to record into. The m-audio thing comes bundled with a basic verson of reason, is this a good thing? Are Edirols osx drivers capable of recording to 24 bit? Can the eridol record at 96 like the m-audio.

Both units are the same price in Australia and i am not sure which way to go, any help would be greatly appreciated

cheers chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 1)
alcolo
post Sun 13 Apr 2003, 21:13
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 09-Apr 03
From: Mch - ID
Member No.: 15,827




Hi!

Please see below some info about the UA-20:

"EDIROL
UA-20

EDIROL UA-20 USB audio interface, signal processing in24Bit/ 44.1 + 48kHz and 48 kHz, line and guitar/microphoneinput, headphone output, MIDI In/Out, incl. ASIO +WDM-Drivers, PC and Mac "


bye,

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Tue 17 Dec 2024, 05:05
- © 440 Forums 2011