 Edirol Ua-20 Vs M-audio Audiophile 24/96 For Osx, unsure which budget card to get |
  Wed 9 Apr 2003, 11:34
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 08-Apr 03 From: Taroona - AU Member No.: 15,734  |
hi,
I am tossing up between buying either a edirol ua-20 vs m-audio audiophile 24/96 for OSX,as a busget recording solution, i only want to record guitar tracks one at a time from an amp modeller (v-amp2) and was wondering if anyone had a suggestion as which way to go? I am using reason & recycle but will need to use some sort of OSX software to record into. The m-audio thing comes bundled with a basic verson of reason, is this a good thing? Are Edirols osx drivers capable of recording to 24 bit? Can the eridol record at 96 like the m-audio. Both units are the same price in Australia and i am not sure which way to go, any help would be greatly appreciated cheers chris |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 1)
|
Sun 13 Apr 2003, 21:13
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 09-Apr 03 From: Mch - ID Member No.: 15,827 |
Hi!
Please see below some info about the UA-20: "EDIROL UA-20 EDIROL UA-20 USB audio interface, signal processing in24Bit/ 44.1 + 48kHz and 48 kHz, line and guitar/microphoneinput, headphone output, MIDI In/Out, incl. ASIO +WDM-Drivers, PC and Mac " bye, John |
|
|
|
 |
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
