 Mastering: Peak, T-racks, Or Other? |
 Tue 27 Feb 2007, 09:10
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 02-Jun 06 Member No.: 80,236  |
I'm currently using Cubase SE as my sequencer and I'm wondering which is more flexible for mastering...Bias Peak LE or just bouncing the mix down to a stereo .wav and using something like T-Racks in Cubase?
I'm open to other options, as well. -wilhelm |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 3)
|
Tue 6 Mar 2007, 22:29
Post
#2
|
|
 Tikophobe forever…  Group: Team Posts: 6,651 Joined: 08-Feb 03 From: Fontaine Daniel - FR Member No.: 11,773 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 07:45
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 04-Oct 06 From: Groningen - NL Member No.: 83,850 |
i think t-racks is a very good choice your 'mastering' ...with an easy GUI
and have a good (analog) sound ... now a few years is izotope also an good alternate for your mastering.... 
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:17
Post
#4
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 25-Oct 05 From: Kaliningrad - RU Member No.: 71,671 |
It is common to consider that either way would be flexible enough. Cubase is well fit to handle mastering tasks, and T-Racks is a well respected mastering tool. You might want to chenk out articles on the web regarding mastering in your DAW, like the one at http://www.tweakheadz.com/mastering_your_audio.htm or, of course, SOS archives at www.soundonsound.com. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
