 Gigastudio Vs Mach 5 |
|
|
|
|
 Mon 8 Jan 2007, 12:59
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 29-Dec 06
From: PARIS - FR
Member No.: 86,729
|
Hello you film scorers,
I need to expand into more GigaStudio units, to faster produce film scores, and I am seriously considering Mach 5 as an alternative, since I love OSX and am a Mac user since 87, and I still don't make it with all this PC Windows XP approach…
Has anyone done some comparison with both applications yet ?
Thanks a lot for sharing it.
liberty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 2)
|
|
Tue 9 Jan 2007, 15:04
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 09-Jan 07
From: Pembroke Pines - US
Member No.: 87,133
|
QUOTE (Liberty @ Mon 8 Jan 2007, 06:59)  Hello you film scorers,
I need to expand into more GigaStudio units, to faster produce film scores, and I am seriously considering Mach 5 as an alternative, since I love OSX and am a Mac user since 87, and I still don't make it with all this PC Windows XP approach…
Has anyone done some comparison with both applications yet ?
Thanks a lot for sharing it.
liberty I have Mach 5 which is quite good. But if you're running large sessions, will probably have challenge of using multiple Macs. May I suggest that you check out the Receptor from Muse Research. It's a dedicated VST synth in a hardware box. They're currently selling multiple units designed for film composers. Apparently they're developing a way to run the new Giga software on these units as well. For more info, call the company itself. They're very willing to take time to talk to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
