MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
> Drum Sequencing - Digital Performer Or Different, Which software for sequencing?
Badshirt
post Wed 16 Aug 2006, 18:08
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 26-Sep 01
From: Kutztown
Member No.: 1,868




I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4.
The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only.

I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts?

I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC?

Any thoughts?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
gdoubleyou
post Wed 16 Aug 2006, 19:14
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




QUOTE (Badshirt @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 09:08) *
I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4.
The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only.

I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts?

I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC?

Any thoughts?


Try the drum editor!
blink.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Badshirt
post Wed 16 Aug 2006, 19:25
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 26-Sep 01
From: Kutztown
Member No.: 1,868




QUOTE (gdoubleyou @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 18:14) *
QUOTE (Badshirt @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 09:08) *

I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4.
The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only.

I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts?

I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC?

Any thoughts?


Try the drum editor!
blink.gif


I've only been recording audio until this point and laid down a bit w/ the drum editor. I guess its inexperience but it seems to me like there isn't much control in editing individual tom hits. Maybe I have it configured incorrectly or need to learn the software better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Mon 16 Dec 2024, 19:55
- © 440 Forums 2011