Dual 2.8 Or 4mb Ram?, Whats best for Cubase w/softsynts |
|
|
|
Wed 3 Aug 2005, 10:24
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 23-Mar 04
From: Oslo - NO
Member No.: 39,189
|
At the same price I could either get a dual 2.8 with 1 gig ram or a dual 2.0 gig with 4 gigs. Whats the best option? Cubase audio demands good cpu, as I understand, but softsynths and specially soft samplers need more ram?
Upgrading from a 800 Mhz G4, I know I will recieve satisfaction, but still, I dont want to reach the roof after 1 more year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
(1 - 5)
|
Wed 3 Aug 2005, 10:53
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
The most powerful CPU! The ram you can be it extending little by little.
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 3 Aug 2005, 11:45
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
The G5 is another history. Many of the problems that you can have at the moment will disappear. Everything is easier. You must have well-taken care of with the bandwidth of your hard disk. I have a Lacie Fireware 800 and the combination with the G5 is very good. While controls the ram and the bandwidth, your CPU will be in charge of all the others. Sight if all your system is compatible with Tiger. Still it gives some problems that in just a short time will be solved.
This post has been edited by Jsegura: Wed 3 Aug 2005, 11:49
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 4 Aug 2005, 21:54
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 26-Jul 05
From: Elkridge - US
Member No.: 68,173
|
Go with the more powerful CPU. You can add more RAM later, but you're stuck with the cpu you get until you buy a new computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|