MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Samson Monitors, diff between resolv 80a's and rubicon's
greeneye
post Thu 28 Apr 2005, 22:29
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 28-Apr 05
From: Downpatrick - UK
Member No.: 64,916




Hi, can anyone tell me the difference between the samson resolov 80a's and their next level rubicon series. There is hardly any word on them to be found on the web. This would be much appreciated as I'm a complete novice all I know is that the rubicons because they use 'ribbon' for their cones it means they do not colour the sound which I prefer. but as I say havn't gotta clue, thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 9)
mrgrimm
post Fri 29 Apr 2005, 05:21
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-Feb 05
From: Tokyo - JP
Member No.: 60,810




i second that and i would love to hear something
about their bass as there is nothing about it
on the net afaik.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bufflo
post Sat 30 Apr 2005, 03:11
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-May 03
From: SE
Member No.: 18,540




Well, I don't know much about them, but they have them at my local music store. So I listened to them, and I was a bit surprised. They're nothing like the other Samson monitors. The treble is very clear and detailed, the image did feel kind of "collected", but not narrow in a bad sense. Since I'm about to buy some monitors in that price range, I'll be going back there soon with my own music and listen again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mrgrimm
post Sat 30 Apr 2005, 03:18
Post #4


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-Feb 05
From: Tokyo - JP
Member No.: 60,810




so what about the bass?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Sat 30 Apr 2005, 03:34
Post #5


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




Ribbons are great, but have other problems (more prone to failure, sensible to shocks). The sweet spot can be smaller too if i remember well.

If you want to be surprised listen to some ADAM speakers one day, Since I did, I want a pair one day… rolleyes.gif But it's aimed at a higher market anyway.

Keep us informed bufflo, always good to have some input outside the press wink.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
greeneye
post Sat 30 Apr 2005, 15:42
Post #6


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 28-Apr 05
From: Downpatrick - UK
Member No.: 64,916




Thanks bufflo, keep me informed when you have a listen as I cannot get near any monitors where I'm from and I dread having to trust someone in retail over the phone without enough info. Also in response to what both you and lepetitmartien mention about the stereo imaging, the add for the samsons says that they provide "unbelievable stereo imaging" which was one of the reasons that first attracted me to them, so it would be great to hear how they sound bufflo with your music. But, as regards mrgrimm's point it would also be good to have comparison between the resolv 80a's bass and the rubicon's as this would be the clincher for me. Cheers again everyone, you're helping me loads.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Sun 1 May 2005, 01:39
Post #7


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




Resolv 80 got a good review in Sound on Sound, but I've still to hear them…

Ribbons are especially good at fast transients, so you bring up more details, clearer image, smaller sweet spot though, on the ADAMs it's even "disturbing" the level of detail, fascinating monitors. Not to everyone taste though.

I'd really like to know more about the Samson/ribbons, as their position in the market could change things a lot. There's many "sounding like a bad hi-fi" monitors in the home-studio end of the market, and bring some quality would do this good. (in clear : lots of "I want to be a NS10 but I don't have the guts to sound as crap" and not enough "chirurgicallly flat and as unbiased as possible" -in the limits of price/technique)

There's a lot of new monitors around, it'd be good if every one could share his experiences.


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bufflo
post Tue 10 May 2005, 09:38
Post #8


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-May 03
From: SE
Member No.: 18,540




Okay, so I finally checked out the Rubicons again, brought a cd of songs I know well with me to the store. I did an A/B with them and other monitors in the same price range.

The Rubicon's treble is very bright and sparkly, it really came through on acoustic material, as well as expensive preamp/mic vocals. The low mids are kind of lacking, so maybe that's a testament to the curve being flat (and you're supposed to use it with a sub with a high crossfreq)?

They would be interesting monitors to own for sure, but I won't buy them for two reasons. I'm a producer/songwriter more than an engineer, so when I write I want to feel those low mids that kind of push the song in the right direction. I didn't feel any of that with the Rubicons, they weren't breathing down there.

The second thing is the sweet spot, it's very precise. Turn your head the slightest, and the sound is totally different. Move back a bit, and it sounds like crap. I guess ribbon speakers just aren't for me, the made me feel trapped. I wouldn't be able to use them as my primary monitors, but for anyone looking for something different they're definitely worth checking out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Tue 10 May 2005, 23:20
Post #9


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




Thanks for the feedback! smile.gif
i should really check them out biggrin.gif

Was it the 5A or 6A?


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bufflo
post Wed 11 May 2005, 17:53
Post #10


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-May 03
From: SE
Member No.: 18,540




The 6's. I'm getting the Rokit8's, god knows how they will sound in my room, but you've got to start somewhere...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Mon 2 Dec 2024, 08:40
- © MacMusic 1997-2008