Which Format Do You Record In? And Why?, .wav, .aif, .sd2 ??? |
|
|
2 Pages
1 2 >
|
|
Replies
(1 - 9)
|
Thu 4 Nov 2004, 11:33
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 370
Joined: 19-Mar 03
From: Umeå - SE
Member No.: 14,645
|
Whatever format my apps work with. Convert them later if I have to.
Cheers: Dixiechicken
--------------------
================== Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 5 Nov 2004, 14:13
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 370
Joined: 19-Mar 03
From: Umeå - SE
Member No.: 14,645
|
You must make a separation between regular audio-files like *:aif or *.wav or *.mp3.
and audio-files/soundbites from an sequenser /DAW such as DP-4 or Logic (whatever format Logic uses).
The soundbites from (sound designer format ?) DP-4 also contains meta data such as edits performed or tempo information and perhaps other region-info as well.
These kind of aufio-files are not directly compatible/comparable with aif and wav files as an example.
Most DAW:s and serveral other programs can export and comvert between various formats though.
Cheers: Dixiechicken
--------------------
================== Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 5 Nov 2004, 16:50
|
Webmaster
Group: Admin
Posts: 3,204
Joined: 29-Oct 00
From: Sommieres - FR
Member No.: 11
|
Not having to convert between formats when you want to use your samples in any application is really confortable and creative... On Mac, AIFF is nowadays defacto the best compatible format. SOme apps read wavs, others (rarest on OSX) read sd2, but all read AIFF. Also the advantage of AIFF versus SD2 is that both formats can store regions definitions inside the audio file, but only AIFF can store the base note of your sample, which is really convenient when you import a muilti sample instrument on a virtual sampler which smartly recognize theses base note informations encoded inside the AIFF files to automatically spread your samples on the keyboard map.
AIFF is the right choice if you want to avoid spending time to convert samples before being able to use them, and to offer the most features. IMHO, the less time you spend on technic (converting, importing...) , the more time you can spend to be creative, which is the essence of music.
Of course, if you are working on a multiplatofrm environnement , often switching between macs and PCs, WAV would be the best choice.
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 00:25
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044
|
also, sd11, nowadays, is almost exclusively a pro-tools format, in as much as it's the only format that treats stereo files as dual mono/split stereo! so, if you're using pro-tools hardware, this is the format for you, otherwise aiff (audio interchangeable file format) is the most universal presuming that you use a mac...
This post has been edited by damann: Wed 17 Nov 2004, 00:32
--------------------
one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|