MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
> New To Mac What's Better?, Cubase sx or logic pro
professorpious
post Sat 14 Aug 2004, 06:43
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 14-Aug 04
From: Malden - US
Member No.: 48,792




I Just got my powerbook, yay! its the 1.33ghz 512mb ram, with the fast harddrive (7800rpm i think). I've got the Edirol fa-101 for my audio interface.
Right now I'm using reason 2.5, I'm lookng to add audio to my tracks. Should I go with Cubase or Logic for this? they both support rewire as far as I know. I have no experience with either program so will be learning which ever I choose. Seems like most people talk about using logic in this forum and a friend said "logic hands down". Just wondering what some others think before I go dropping a grand.
thanks in advance,
JS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 20)
Presto
post Sat 14 Aug 2004, 14:31
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 799
Joined: 24-Mar 02
From: Entre-Deux-Mers - FR
Member No.: 3,984




Try using the search button. If you're not very good with keywords or are just lazy, try this:

http://www.macmusic.org/agora/forums/index...base&s=&lang=FR


--------------------
Without shit, we wouldn't be here ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
professorpious
post Sun 15 Aug 2004, 04:28
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 14-Aug 04
From: Malden - US
Member No.: 48,792




Thanks, for some reason I didn't see that buttton blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Tue 17 Aug 2004, 19:03
Post #4


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




I don't suggest SX for single cpu machines. From my observation SX uses 40%-60% more CPU than DP4,and Logic 6, with the same load.

Performance was so bad on my 1GHz Powerbook, that I moved my SX licence to my PC.

SX choked my Powerbook at 8-10 tracks. the same machine can easily handle sessions of 32-48 tracks using DP4, and Logic6, with Logic being slightly more cpu effecient than DP4.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jklimeck
post Tue 17 Aug 2004, 22:13
Post #5


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 30-Aug 03
From: Los Angeles - US
Member No.: 23,858




Used DP for years, DP4 is the first incarnation of DP for OS X, as such I still think it needs to be optimized.



Logic or DP, cant go wrong

(Forget Cubase / Nuendo)

And I am seriously considering Logic over DP these days
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pdgood
post Tue 17 Aug 2004, 23:39
Post #6


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 02-Feb 04
From: Nashville - US
Member No.: 34,758




Here's the opinions I have gathered from years of forum searching and conversations:
Cubase is the sequencer of choice for PC users.
Logic is the sequencer of choice for Macs, although DP has a very strong following.
Logic has better CPU efficiency and is quicker to keep up with the changes in the marketplace (first to add AU).
DP (which I use and love) is very stable, has good tech support, is far cheaper than Logic, is a smaller company and its fans are very close knit. It strongly resembles Opcode which was a very popular sequencer of old.
The only negative I've heard about Logic is that it is more complex to learn (less user friendly at the beginning). Logic users say that once this hurdle is cleared, it does more than other sequencers and does it better. (Also rock solid).
My opinion:
I could not keep Cubase from crashing on my Mac. I could not afford the $1000 price tag for pro logic and bought DP4. I've been very happy with that decision.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riverdog
post Sun 29 Aug 2004, 21:54
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 14-Mar 04
From: Grand Rapids - US
Member No.: 38,439




I agree with the your opinion of Opcode...
I was an Opcode user for years until they got eaten by Gibson...

My move to Logic was somewhat painful but worth the move...
Logic Pro offers a wonderful package with all the synths, improved audio function and unbeatable MIDI implementation...

I've never seen Logic Express...
But, if you want a great package Logic is the one...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Mon 30 Aug 2004, 07:28
Post #8


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




Just my 2 cents.

I do use Cubase on both mac anc pc and have no issues. It's the exact same experience on both platforms.

It's very powerful and super-intuitive to learn.

I use a firewire hard drive so I have not had issues with track count.

But maybe this week I'll do a test to see how many tracks it takes to max out my powerbook

Scott
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
guitar
post Mon 30 Aug 2004, 08:00
Post #9


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 19-Jun 01
From: Sydney
Member No.: 1,007




Cubase SX is an excellent program but the plugins are very average. Also you can't boot a 24bit session without pluging your sound card in. Logic has better plugins by far. I use protools.They all have problems but they all do the job.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arnolfo
post Tue 31 Aug 2004, 17:32
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 04-Jul 03
From: Porto - PT
Member No.: 20,713




Try the Ableton Live 4 demo. You might like it. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Wed 1 Sep 2004, 01:23
Post #11


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




Stress test update.

Started the stress test today:

15" powerbook
867 MHz powerPC G4
512 MB RAM

OS X 10.2.8

ADCOM Firewire Drive

Cubase SX 2

24 simultaneous audio tracks so far without breaking a sweat.

Also used two TC Reverbs as send effects

and a handful of Compressors and Limiters as inserts

Hear it here: http://homepage.mac.com/scott_h_wilder/world2.mp3

This post has been edited by swilder: Wed 1 Sep 2004, 01:27
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Wed 1 Sep 2004, 01:42
Post #12


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




I'll add more tracks tomorrow to try to max out the drive

Maybe even a few soft synths. (Those will max out the cpu fast)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Fri 3 Sep 2004, 20:31
Post #13


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




1GHz 12inch Powerbook Logic Audio

32 audio tracks channel eq, 10 tracks with compression,16 frozen audio instruments CPU=40% HD=20%

SX2 10 tracks sx dynamics, pops, clicks at all buffer settings CPU=80%

sad.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Sat 4 Sep 2004, 03:28
Post #14


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




gdoubleyou,

Are you using an external drive or the internal hard drive?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
professorpious
post Sun 5 Sep 2004, 06:16
Post #15


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 14-Aug 04
From: Malden - US
Member No.: 48,792




hey thanks for all the opinions much appreciated. So all this talk from swilder about external hard drives makes me have to ask.
My Pbook only has the 1 firewire port being that its the 12" model. I'm useing it now for my audio interface. If an external harddrive is on the same bus (via a firewire hub i guess) will I see improvement in performance? Not that I'm anywhere near needing an external drive yet. Just thought I'd ask , since you all brought it up smile.gif
JS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Presto
post Sun 5 Sep 2004, 20:50
Post #16


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 799
Joined: 24-Mar 02
From: Entre-Deux-Mers - FR
Member No.: 3,984




I recorded audio on my G3 ibook before getting an external fw drive. I didn't go over 16 tracks (often just 8) in protools LE on OS9, used few plugins and parcimoniously. The problems I encountered were: learning how to get things done, my slowness, getting lost due to not giving names to all the bits and bats, and particularly accepting how far I was from being a musical genius. If there were any problems due to using the internal drive, I didn't notice.

Alot of people on here try for technical perfection, but I don't think it's worth getting worried about that too much until I'm satisfied with some of the music I try to compose. I did listen to advice here when I started out and knew, when I got a usb interface, that the single FW would be available for the external drive. I discovered MacMusic just in time.

When you start doing good stuff, then you should get an external drive. If you want to use 32 tracks and bulldoze with plugins right from the start, you'll probably need it very soon and will have to either change the PB or get a usb sound interface. But if you don't demand too much of your set-up while you're learning and you're as slow as me, the problem shouldn't worry you for quite a while.


--------------------
Without shit, we wouldn't be here ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Mon 6 Sep 2004, 05:10
Post #17


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




Having the audio card and hard drive on the same firewire port is of no consequence.

In a session I usually only record a few tracks at a time which is nowher near the full bandwith of the firewire pipe. Even is you record 8 to 16 tracks at a time, you should have any problems.

Scott
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Wed 8 Sep 2004, 18:17
Post #18


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




QUOTE (swilder @ Sep 3 2004, 18:28)
gdoubleyou,

Are you using an external drive or the internal hard drive?

I'm using a Pro Tools certified 80Gb hard drive from Pacific Pro Audio.
http://www.pacificproaudio.com/drives.asp

cool.gif

My pain is over, now i sold my SX licence this weekend.
wink.gif

This post has been edited by gdoubleyou: Wed 8 Sep 2004, 18:18


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
landlox
post Fri 17 Sep 2004, 02:49
Post #19


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 04-Aug 04
From: The Bronx - US
Member No.: 48,227




I have read this thread with interest - I am a MIDI beginner and would like software to build up some simple amateur arrangements of my little attempts at songs.

Any reccomendations appreciated -
I have a B&W G3 Mac that has a G4 500mhz upgrade chip. OX X 10.2.8, 512 ram.

I have a consumer Casio (WK-1300) MIDI keyboard sitting here for noodling on. I'm not up on all the jargon etc.

It seems that the choice for my needs is either Cubase SE ($99 at Sam Ash) or Logic Express ($133 with student ID at college stores). IF I understand, they have similar features and would work with such a keyboard

I would say I need 4 - 6 tracks each of audio and the same for Midi (at least for now).

I could use audio pitch shifting (given my limitations as a player) and if i understand right, they both have this.

That aside, all I need is for these things to work with my Mac and keyboard.

Are there any serious differencs - i don't really understand all the 'effects' the web sites mention - or if they're important (I assume its simple things like audio 'echo' or 'reverb' kind of stuff my voice could use).

Finally 2 tech questions -
in the CUBASE SE 'system requirements' it says:
"Sound Card: CoreAudio compatible audio hardware"

Is that something beyond whats in a B&W Powermac?? (what IS it?)

for Logic express the requirements say:
"Low latency audio hardware recommended"

Same question - what is this? is my equipment up to this? Do I NEED to buy things to make it work?

Thanks - Landlox
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xingu
post Fri 17 Sep 2004, 05:17
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 25-Jul 02
From: Strongsville - US
Member No.: 6,217




Landlox - no need to post the same question(s) twice - someone will find you and answer if possible. See my answer in the other thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
landlox
post Fri 17 Sep 2004, 21:50
Post #21


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 04-Aug 04
From: The Bronx - US
Member No.: 48,227




My apologies again for the repetition. I'm BRAND new here, Sorry sorry sorry. And thanks for your answers.

So for this thread I'll stick to my original question - given my Mac's specs (see prior post, this thread) -

How do Logic Express and Cubase SE compare for features?
It sounds like my computer can handle them. I have the G4/500 cpu - just wonder if the B&W has a slower internal speeds (bus?) and if that matters.

As to features - I've read the web sites but the long lists are a bit overwhelming. You are all saying CUBASE is MUCH easier to understand (beginner-wise) but more demanding on the CPU.

Is the main difference that Logic Express just has more sounds and effects?

Thanks for your patience.
Landlox
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Tue 17 Dec 2024, 21:13
- © 440 Forums 2011