Logic 5.5 , Os X, And Motu 828 Help |
|
|
|
Sat 30 Nov 2002, 06:13
|
Rookie
Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 18-Nov 02
From: Hempstead - US
Member No.: 9,360
|
just updated to OS X and logic 5.5 , but i am having weird problems...
for one, I can only have 2 outputs for my 828.... there is no ASIO, its only Core audio, so i cant see the motu 828 driver.
Also, when playing my supernova 2 keyboard, it plays fine through the motu 828, but when I play an audio instrument like esx24, it comes out of the front tiny speaker of my 867 MDD g4! Weird...maybe someone can help me...
|
|
|
|
|
Sat 30 Nov 2002, 18:40
|
Rookie
Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 18-Nov 02
From: Hempstead - US
Member No.: 9,360
|
ummm, read thereviews from the link you have provided....
MOTU sucks. These fools have got to get with the program and release those damn PCI 324 drivers. DP will be out later this year? That's 6 weeks folks. This company is hopeless. Bottom line: UNREAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------ puppykrusher Nov 15, 2002 what a scam -- this is the same beta driver as before, only repackaged with a fancy 1.0 on it instead of a "beta". it still has no optical i/o and no console. LAME. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dor Sep 3, 2002 anyone know if MOTU will be developing a PCI-324 driver for X? DP and my 2408 are the only apps keeping me in 9.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pherin Aug 30, 2002 Damn, it took you long enough MOTU to get these out, however I understand that OSX's audio support has been sketchy. I must say though, near flawless implementation, I just wish you would include the console, I need to be able to set the thru's on my 828. Keep the updates coming :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Dec 2002, 06:07
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 508
Joined: 09-Jul 02
From: Sydney - AU
Member No.: 5,658
|
QUOTE (Levon River @ Dec 1 2002, 02:48) Since 15 November 2002 there has been the 1.0 version of the OS X driver for the MOTU 828 sitting in the briar patch over on VersionTracker. I must have posted this about, what-- Five times now? If you go to the MOTU website (which seems the logical place to download software updates for their own products) you will see that this product is a Public Beta. Read the MOTU website. Installs a pre-release public beta of the MOTU 828 Driver. Requires OSX version 10.1.5 or higher. Please read the installer's ReadMe file for current limitations of this driver. The software on the versiontracker website is exactly the same. Why don't you download both and check for yourself. I imagine version tracker has failed to label the item correctly as a beta version and also has the wrong creation date. If I want to get the latest version of some software for emagic products guess where I go. It's not version tracker. So no matter how many times you have posted it Levon River, it is still only a Beta version. I don't actually own any MOTU products so I can't say I keep up to date with the latest versions of their drivers. I was just pointing E rouge to the logical place to look and noticed they were BETA.
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Dec 2002, 09:55
|
Senior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 296
Joined: 10-Aug 02
From: Rimghobb - UA
Member No.: 6,734
|
QUOTE (E rouge @ Nov 30 2002, 17:40) ummm, read thereviews from the link you have provided.... Ummmm, I read them. But thanks for the memories. WTF does wanker whining about no PCI card drivers for the 2408 have to do with a firewire driver for the 828? It was irrelevant when it was posted on VersionTracker, and it's irrelevant now. As for the 1.0.0 vs. 1.0b1 controversy, I explain things calmly to formatj below. You might want to follow the bouncing ball... Or not. It might be a head. Please don't reply to me; send all complaints and questions to: info@motu.com
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Dec 2002, 10:20
|
Senior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 296
Joined: 10-Aug 02
From: Rimghobb - UA
Member No.: 6,734
|
QUOTE (formatj @ Dec 1 2002, 05:07) QUOTE (Levon River @ Dec 1 2002, 02:48) Since 15 November 2002 there has been the 1.0 version of the OS X driver for the MOTU 828 sitting in the briar patch over on VersionTracker. I must have posted this about, what-- Five times now?
If you go to the MOTU website (which seems the logical place to download software updates for their own products) you will see that this product is a Public Beta. I know how to find a web site. And if *you* download the software and install it (which you haven't), then get "Info" on the "MOTUFireWireAudio.kext" file, you will find a bright and shiny "1.0.0," NOT a "1.0b1"--which is what the blurb on MOTU's download page says the file is, and which is what they once had on the site for downloading according to the information I have. MOTU is notorious for being slow about updating text on their web pages. I haven't deconstructed their software to determine what, if any, changes they made between 1.0b1 and 1.0.0, and neither have the wankers whining on VersionTracker that it's the "same" file as before (when it was earlier released clearly labled as BETA). And neither have you, by the way. Both the public beta AND the "1.0" versions were announced separately--that's separately--on VersionTracker by MOTU. So if MOTU is confused about their own software, and VersionTracker is passing along that confusion, and some clown on VersionTracker decides to pronounce that it's all the same, and you want to buy into that "expert opinion," be my guest. As far as I know, the mages at MOTU decided that their beta was good enough for 1.0.0. It's their software; that's their call to make--not yours, not mine. I've reported, accurately, that a 1.0 version was announced by MOTU on VersionTracker. And I've confirmed that the current file, when installed, has no "b" in it anywhere, but has "1.0.0." If you feel MOTU is somehow abusing software version numbering conventions, take it up with them--*not* with me: info@motu.com In the meantime, the facts as I reported them--what, about six times now?--are accurate: MOTU has publicly released, through VersionTracker, what THEY are publicly calling 1.0 versions, both of their firewire drivers for OS X, and of their USB MIDI drivers for OS X. Period, paragraph, and end of my participation in dancing 'round the May pole waving airy pink ribbons. If you've still got an issue with the facts as MOTU has presented them, please refer to the handy e-mail address included for your convenience above. Won't even cost you a stamp.
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Dec 2002, 12:32
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 508
Joined: 09-Jul 02
From: Sydney - AU
Member No.: 5,658
|
Levon River, I really don't care what version MOTU calls their product and I don't know why you are so upset about this. I am only stating the facts from the website. I was only offering some assistance to a fellow musician and informing him about a driver for his interface. Also you have no idea whether I have installed this software or not. I actually do a lot of work in music tech support and I have actually installed the latest driver from the MOTU website a number of times for various clients. If you read the installer info when installing the driver it actually states that the driver is beta in the middle of the installation process. However maybe MOTU have it wrong, what would they know!? Thanks for telling everyone six times that the driver is not beta, we are all better for it. Like I said, I don't care about names of drivers, just as long as they work. I am only here to help. Please don't turn this into some sort of war over something so petty, I'm sorry I responded to the post in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Mon 9 Dec 2002, 02:43
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 08-Dec 02
From: West Chester - US
Member No.: 9,924
|
It's been wonderful following this thread, because I've encountered the same problems with the Motu OSX drivers and Logic 5.5
I *can* see activity on my Audio Input meters when I play my synth through the 828. The synth is plugged into inputs 3-4, and the lights on the 828 light up as well. The problem is I can't *hear* anything. I can record "blind", so to speak. I can even play back what I recorded. However, the problem is that I can't monitor what I'm recording.
Does there need to be some other object added to environment so that what is passing through the faders can be monitored on the 828's headphones or monitor outputs? (or even Output 1-2?)
Thanks for any help. I'm new to the forum.
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|