MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Motu Vs Digi 002, whats better?
imago
post Sat 22 Jan 2005, 13:18
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 21-Jan 05
From: Zagreb - CU
Member No.: 58,891




hello everyone!
i have this dilema...
i would like to choose good audio solution for my home studio.
some of my friends tell me to go with DIGI 002, some tell me to go with MOTU 828 MkII(and with tascam mixer).
i would like to use Pro tools and Logic 7 on the system.
do you have any inputs about this? whats better? pro's and cons...
please help me get this solved!
thanks!!!!

ps: i use G4 dual 1.42
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nels
post Sat 22 Jan 2005, 15:07
Post #2


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 25-Sep 03
From: Brookfield, IL. - US
Member No.: 25,398




There is already, much of that type of debate right within these walls. Do a search!(UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER) Type in exactly as you did, .."Motu vs. Digi 002" ...There's also plenty of info. here on Logic, Pro Tools, Digital Performer, Garageband, etc. Now, you won't have to wait. ...Ain't that great?

A few things to keep in mind, ....Pro Tools is a DAW of the proprietary kind. And Pro Tools/Digi 002 lacks somewhat in the midi department.

As for Logic, ..I've read that it's truly great and especially with the Mac, but I've also read that it has an extra-large learning curve.

Some time ago, I too had faced that same dilemma. I went with Motu 828mkII / Digital Performer 4.11, 4.12, and now DP 4.5 and I can't express enough just how happy I am with my decision. ...But, you really should do the research, read from others and definitely make your own mind up.

Good luck!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imago
post Sat 22 Jan 2005, 19:00
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 21-Jan 05
From: Zagreb - CU
Member No.: 58,891




thank you nells biggrin.gif
i will do the research and make my mind when i know all the facts. but if someone has any knowledge about this subject be free to tell me your personal toughts about this matter.
tnx!!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Sat 22 Jan 2005, 22:26
Post #4


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




If you want to use PT, you NEED to have some digidesign hardware… You can't run PT LE if you don't have a Digidesign interface.

And we can still cry on the disappearance of PT Free… sad.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nels
post Sun 23 Jan 2005, 02:46
Post #5


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 25-Sep 03
From: Brookfield, IL. - US
Member No.: 25,398




Hence, the word...Proprietary.

You know, imago, amigo, ..I have to apologize. Just for the heck of it, I did a search within these walls and I must say, ...didn't get much. Sorry bout that! I've had great success in the past. ....Could be they've done some cleaning up around here....After all, all those posts, from all those topics, ..must pile up over time.

Definitely do a google search though. You're sure to get some answers there. And go into the Logic and Motu forums, as well.......

For example: http://www.osxaudio.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=2
http://www.voiceofdoubt.com/motumachine/

Good luck kiddo ...and again, ...SORRY! Really didn't mean to give you a bum steer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Sun 23 Jan 2005, 03:33
Post #6


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




On the search, remember the time option is (unfortunately) by default on less than 30 days… cool.gif

On MOTU, Unicornation is DA place.


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
popina
post Sun 13 Feb 2005, 23:53
Post #7


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-Feb 05
From: Draper - US
Member No.: 60,367




Hey I have a question concerning the Motu 828. From the reviews and explanations I have read about it, it sounds like you dont even need to have a mixer to go with it for live sound. Is this true? or would it be stupid not to have the two?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaboombahchuck
post Wed 16 Feb 2005, 14:49
Post #8


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 495
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Chandler - US
Member No.: 2,003




Yes the MOTU 828 mkII can be used as a stand alone unit. If all you need is 8 ins, and 2 pre mic ins. If you need more than that it would be a good idea to get a mixer that is ADAT optical ready, and boom! you've got 8 more audio ins, for a total of 18 controllable ins (including the 2 mic pre's). That will likely exceed the ablilities of most "note book" macs (recording 18 tracks simultainiously).


--------------------
kaboombahchuck
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Metalflkk
post Thu 17 Feb 2005, 05:40
Post #9


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 03-Nov 04
From: Maumee - US
Member No.: 54,337




Yes yes, I would agree with the other posters, go MOTU!! I have worked primarily with a Digi002/PTLE G5/OSX system and the 002 has been nothing but trouble with anything other than PTLE, it is finicky and very specific.

On the other hand, over the summer I had a chance to be working in a lab with MOTU gear and based on those wonderful experiences and the general transparancy of the interface hardware itself in relation to various DAW software I will myself hopefully be getting the new Traveler unit by the end of the month.

If you NEED an inexpensive ProTools rig, then get the Digi002 (only option really.) BUT if you are going to use something like L7pro anyway then I would highly reccomend steering clear of Digidesign gear, you pay too high a price for too finicky an interface w/ the digi002/r.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LOSG
post Mon 21 Feb 2005, 16:37
Post #10


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 01-Oct 04
From: Maplewood - US
Member No.: 52,198




How about the Yamaha 01X? Do your research, and find out like I did. The 01X willgive you all the bells and whistles you need to make you DAW fly, as well as give you a real audio interface, and 24 channel mixer. This is not an advertisement for Yamaha. I was skeptical at first, but did my homework. I even read a few post in this forum that pissed all over the 01X , Yamaha, and the emerging MLAN MIDI standard. I am running DP 4.5 on a dual 1.8Gig G5.
I have a Motif ES-8 connected to the G5 via firewire, the 01X is also connected via firewire. Both run using MLAN.
It all works, and very well. I am also very happy with the Tech support I have recieved from Yamaha. Weather you are using a PC or a MAC. The 01X and MLAN are the way to go. It all works very efficiently. Big ups to Yamaha!!!!!!!! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Mon 23 Dec 2024, 18:29
- © MacMusic 1997-2008