MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Performer 4.5 On Mac G4?
Milca
post Wed 8 Dec 2004, 08:02
Post #1


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 25-Oct 04
From: San Diego - US
Member No.: 53,854




Hello guys
I have a simple question. I’ve purchased Digital Performer 4.5 and I’m planning to running on my Mac G4 1Ghz 512 MB.Do you think that’s enough power for such a application?

Thank You
Milan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Milca
post Wed 8 Dec 2004, 08:04
Post #2


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 25-Oct 04
From: San Diego - US
Member No.: 53,854




Hello guys
I have a simple question. I’ve purchased Digital Performer 4.5 and I’m planning to run it on my Mac G4 1Ghz 512 MB.Do you think that’s enough power for such a application?
Thank You Milan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mthyde
post Wed 8 Dec 2004, 17:27
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 26-Nov 03
From: Marietta - US
Member No.: 29,756




DP on a 1 Ghz G4? Sure.

You can probably do most projects with the Mac G4, but I'd take the RAM up to 1.5 ghz. I'm running DP 4.5 on an 867 Mhz and a 1.3 dual processor G4. Without 1.5 Ghz of RAM on the dual processor G4, performance was sluggish. You'll only run into problems with CPU intensive plug ins, for which you'll need a dual processor.

Even with a G4 dual processor, you'll have limitations that only a 2.5 Ghz Mac G5 can handle. For instance, on my dual-processor 1.3 Ghz mac, I've got about 40 tracks open in a DP project with numerous vocal retakes, along with two UAD-1 plug-ins on 3 vocal tracks and Auto Tune, plug UAD-1 Nigel on a synth. When I tried adding another layer of UAD plug-ins to the vocal tracks, the Pultec Pro, the machine choked.

Renasanz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tjtjtj3
post Fri 10 Dec 2004, 00:37
Post #4


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 10-Dec 04
From: Arlington - US
Member No.: 56,396




If you take advantage of the "Freeze Tracks" feature and increase buffer size for mixing (when you'll be using more plug-ins and taxing the processor more), it can run more efficiently than DP 4.0. That said, I can't wait to get a G5.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Mon 2 Dec 2024, 09:54
- © MacMusic 1997-2008