Multiple Core Audio Devices? |
|
|
|
Mon 26 Apr 2004, 15:49
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 26-Apr 04
From: North Mankato - US
Member No.: 41,888
|
Is Logic ever going to support multiple core audio devices? Is there anyone else out there that is completely frustrated with not being able to use multiple audio interfaces with Logic Audio in OSX?
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 27 Apr 2004, 06:12
|
Rookie
Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 12-Dec 03
From: Portland - US
Member No.: 30,936
|
Hey, The OSX update to 10.4 is going to deal with alot of this stuff with Core Audio. additional tracks etc. if I understand your complaint. I use DP and Logic and have no problems like you are describing. Usually it's something simple that I have overlooked. Sorry you are having trouble. http://www.thinksecret.com/news/macosx1034.html article below pasted includes Core Audio info for 10.3.4 Apple seeds Mac OS X 10.3.4 By Nick dePlume, Publisher and Editor in Chief April 21, 2004 - Apple this week seeded the first pre-release build of Mac OS X 10.3.4, its fourth minor Panther update. The seed was labeled build 7H41 and was released to developers on Tuesday. In a seed note, Apple said Version 10.3.4 should provide a performance gain when launching non-prebound applications. In addition, the update includes several changes that may affect device compatibility, specifically, TWAIN scanners, USB Flash Media, SCSI drives, iPods, and some PCMCIA cards. The update also reportedly incorporates updates relating to Audio FireWire and USB 2.0 connectivity for the iPod. Version 10.3.4 also includes changes to Core Audio, OpenGL, Graphics, Core OS, and the High Level Toolbox, Apple told developers. Apple also specified several known issues with the latest build involving Quartz Extreme and DVD playback, Safari table rendering, redraw problems, display resolutions, and System Profiler.
--------------------
_______________________________________________________ Gregory Ives Composer/Sound Designer/Producer Portland, OR USA www.gregives.com _______________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 29 Apr 2004, 12:31
|
Maniac Member
Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705
|
That's it, pd - think calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean! A lot of what you say is fair comment, though. Sadly, too many companies rush a product to market ahead of getting it rock-solid first. Steinberg in particular seem guilty of that. Their forum (cubase.net, I think) is full of disgruntled users. I had SX for a while and although I did quite like it, it was too buggy to rely on. So yes, $1,000 is a (heck of a) lot to spend on music software, but with Logic Pro you get everything - and it all works. Sequencer, sampler, synths, plug-ins - it's all good. Believe me, you might think you have no need for a Hammond emulation or a vocoder, but you'll still find yourself using them! With Logic, even if you have a simple 2 in/2 out USB interface, you'll still have precious few headaches. Why not start with Express? Or look out for a secondhand copy of v5 Pro that includes the XSKey, then upgrade. That's how I got my copy of Logic Pro - I bought a PC user's v5 pack who was switching to SX. It is odd that Emagic don't offer any crossgrades or even a demo, though. They did for a while when Apple bought them out, but nothing since. I suppose you need an XSKey to run Logic, so demos would be difficult. I'm still waiting for the fabled 6.4 upgrade that will apparently directly support Apple Loops. It was rumoured to be out for end of February. No sign yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 29 Apr 2004, 15:24
|
Junior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 185
Joined: 18-Apr 03
From: Tampa - US
Member No.: 16,354
|
QUOTE (Barb @ Apr 29 2004, 08:43) My under standing is that the Mac Manager OS X.2 is more stable than the Panther (so the tech guys say). Barb, If your client machines are running 10.2 they will not be managed by Macintosh Manager, they will be managed in "Workgroup Manager" which is a completely different animal. What version of Server are you running? 10.3 or 10.2. ? If you want to manage them in simple finder, 10.3 is much better than the implementation in 10.2, in my experience. I manage about 5 Labs of 10.3 clients with simple finder from 10.3 server. Next year we will switch the students to a regular restricted finder as many apps don't play nice with management. Some very good resources for Mac admins can be found here. http://www.macosxlabs.org/and here, http://www.bombich.com/Hope that helps, TD
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Sat 1 May 2004, 17:04
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 02-Mar 04
From: London - UK
Member No.: 37,446
|
QUOTE (editbrain @ Apr 27 2004, 04:41) IMO That's a stupid idea 1. It's windows 2. Although it does offer space for upgrading, it's not enough and as it's all in one if you want to replace one part your just going to have another box sitting next to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sat 1 May 2004, 18:43
|
Senior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 265
Joined: 05-Dec 03
From: Memphis - US
Member No.: 30,424
|
zelen0, you posted right befor i got a hit submit. i went back to my email and saw a topic reply notification.
i agreee that is tainted because of windows, i personally would not use the neko at this time. unless i was using something like sonar or cubase and had to do a live show and did not want to bring my studio out to a gig. then the neko would be very helpful. also seems that openlabs has some linux based software that you can use, and if i am not mistaken you can use vst in linux. so if it were true that the linux software daw that neko has put together is stable you could have your self a really cool piece of gear. that would kinda give the personal/project studio a new twist. space saving, no need for an external laptop/desktop, built-in audio controler, midi controller, touch screen, keyboard and mouse. sounds pretty sick to me. maybe i will check it out after all.
editbrain
This post has been edited by editbrain: Sat 1 May 2004, 18:48
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|