MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Os X Sample Rate Conversion = Horrible Performance
Cargoplex
post Wed 31 Mar 2004, 01:38
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 04-Sep 03
From: Baltimore - US
Member No.: 24,165




At my job, I deal with very large WAVE files (around 1.5gig) recorded at 24/96.

The client gets data CDs with the 24/96 files on them, and also audio CDs of each file. We use PCs in our sound lab, but I recently aquired two Macs from our graphics department. On the PCs, we use Wavelab's batch processor to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1. This usual averages about 3 minutes file.

So today, I set up a batch process in Peak to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1, and to my amazement/disappointment, it was taking up to 40 MINUTES a file! That is practically real time! The PCs we use are standard Pentium 4's with about a gig or ram. The Mac I use is a 733MHz G4 PowerMac with 1.25 gigs of ram.

I just don't know what else to say. In addition to this devastating revalation, I have also found Peak and the dicontinued Spark to be less than comparable to the power of Sound Forge or Wavelab.

I won't be giving up my Macs anytime soon, but if anyone has any insight on the these issues, please bring your two cents to this post. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
editbrain
post Wed 31 Mar 2004, 05:25
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 265
Joined: 05-Dec 03
From: Memphis - US
Member No.: 30,424




i agree that peak is very slow. i have had this in the back of my mine since coming over to mac. i wonder what the deal is?

happy recording,
editbrain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Thu 1 Apr 2004, 00:35
Post #3


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




cool.gif wrong app for the job, DSP Quattro.
cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cargoplex
post Thu 1 Apr 2004, 00:52
Post #4


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 04-Sep 03
From: Baltimore - US
Member No.: 24,165




I downloaded a demo of DSP-Quattro and it took just as long. In addition to that, every edit made to the waveform required the program to redraw the overview! With a 1.5gig file, that is an unacceptable amount of time to sit and wait after each edit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MrDee
post Thu 1 Apr 2004, 01:35
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 04-Jan 04
From: Brisbane - AU
Member No.: 32,416




You could try Amadeus II or Sound Edit?

I really really wish someone would hurry up and port over a 'GOOD' aiff editing program like soundforge or wavelab (perhaps calling it aifflab!?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
editbrain
post Thu 1 Apr 2004, 03:08
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 265
Joined: 05-Dec 03
From: Memphis - US
Member No.: 30,424




why would it be the wrong app if it is offered?
also this seems to be a problem with the way that mac handles files in a stereo sound editor. this can't be the first time someone has complained about this. i am all for mac being a logic user and all, but the platform cannot compete with windows as long as soundforge is windows only.

maybe this is a serious flaw in the platform and that is why soundforge has not been ported.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 20 Dec 2024, 17:57
- © 440 Forums 2011