MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Analog vs Digital Recording
abbie
post Thu 8 Nov 2001, 18:07
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 01-Mar 01
From: Orleans - CA
Member No.: 322




I am relatively new to multitrack recording. Apart from having recorded a few pieces on my iMac, I have been recently transferring to my Mac some recordings I did 10 years ago on my 4 track portastudio for the purpose of 're-mastering'. I was struck by the relative richness of these old recordings to my more recent ones and was wondering whether I stumbled into the old analog vs digital problem. If so, does a product like T-Rack-S solve the problem or do I simply need to learn how to better use the EQ and VST plug-ins on my multitrack software?


--------------------
Abbie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
post Sat 17 Nov 2001, 19:09
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 821
Joined: 25-Jun 01
From: Springfield - US
Member No.: 1,082




A lot of pros are using tape to record on initially these days because if you record on a good analog tape deck... you can saturate the sound more and add warmth. Then they are taking the recordings from tape and transferring to digital and then performing editing and mixing all in digital domain.

It really depends on your tastes in sound and what you want to achieve. I use T-racks as a final mastering point for my tracks because I like using the compression and limiter to boost tracks a little for hotter sound and using the EQ... you can take a little of digital harshness out of a track but I don't think it is the same as recording to tape as far as sound quality goes.


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
geedoubleyou
post Wed 5 Dec 2001, 00:31
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 08-Nov 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,293




A tube pre-amp used during recording also warms up cold sounding digital audio.

They don't have to be expensive, but they do give you tube saturation/distortion that we so miss.


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abbie
post Wed 5 Dec 2001, 12:26
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 01-Mar 01
From: Orleans - CA
Member No.: 322




Would one use this effect on acoustic instruments and vocals?


--------------------
Abbie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
geedoubleyou
post Fri 7 Dec 2001, 01:27
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 08-Nov 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,293




Yes I would. but it's really not an effect per say.

Just a front end for recording.

After I purchased my TDM-1000 digital mixer I noticed that my recordings were much brighter, than my previous set up of an analog mixer and Korg 1212 I/O.

The difference was the analog mixer card combo. Now with the digital mixer the analog to digital converters on the card don't come into play.

I noticed that my previouse recordings sounded different from the newer ones.
they didn't sound bad, but different.

For me the tube preamp restored the warmth while recording. It's hard to describe, but I can hear it.

Most of my recording is done direct, other considerations are room treatment, quality mikes and mixer.

It's always best to capture the sound you want rather than trying to fix it later.


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abbie
post Mon 10 Dec 2001, 22:27
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 01-Mar 01
From: Orleans - CA
Member No.: 322




Thanks for the reply. I am using an analog mixer and simply going in the sound-in rather than use an audio interface. What really struck me, as I might have mentioned earlier, was the sound difference between tracks recorded on a portastudio compared to the same type of track using the same mics etc. on the computer. Sound clarity is more pronounced when recorded on the iMac but the older recordings are much richer. I think I will look into the tube pre-amp you mentioned, as well as t-racks although I am not crazy about the price.


--------------------
Abbie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
prutulz
post Mon 24 Dec 2001, 23:32
Post #7


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 12-Jan 01
From: Brussels - BE
Member No.: 183




Getting a fat sound with digital is not that hard:
First be sure that your A/D converter are goods. Without serious converters, any effort you spend before the converters, would just be a waste of time (and money).
Then use the correct preamp to boost your low-level (often low-Z,) source (mic, guitar, synth, ...) to the correct level of your converter input.
Always remeber, that you MUST always record a HIGH level in your DAW, if you want to get a sound at least as good as a tape recorder: Due to the quantization process, if you record a sound too low, you will be faced with the quantization noise that is really ugglier than the noise produced by tapes recorded at low levels.
With a good preamp, a good converter, and A GOOD LEVEL, you should get a really better quality than a 4tr. tape.
To add the warmness you like on tape records, good tube preamps work fine!
My favorite include Tubetech (or Pultech) and Summit ones, but they R a bit expensives wink.gif


--------------------
Prutulz
RTFM... is usually not enough
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
post Fri 19 Apr 2002, 01:13
Post #8





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0




In Re: To Abbie's recording technique.

I've recorded several records using a makie board into the minijack on my mac. I noticed that it lacked 'warmth' so I bought a tube compressor from ART, and it really put color into the mix.

The Waves R-compressor plug in helps do a digital warmth as well.

Unfortunately, recording can become an addiction, and where a c1000s may have sufficed in January, a BLUE may be the solution in May. Be careful!

I am not sure what your current set up is, but these new firewire input devices are amazing, the motu 828 is fantastic for it's price range.

If you can stop by http://www.tapeop.com and try to grab a free subscription, that magazine comes from every recording angle and may serve you well!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Welcome Guest
Contribute
Lo-Fi Version - Mon 16 Dec 2024, 01:41
- © PcMusic 1997-2007