|
  |
 Mastering: Peak, T-racks, Or Other? |
|
|
|
|
 Tue 27 Feb 2007, 09:10
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 02-Jun 06
Member No.: 80,236
|
I'm currently using Cubase SE as my sequencer and I'm wondering which is more flexible for mastering...Bias Peak LE or just bouncing the mix down to a stereo .wav and using something like T-Racks in Cubase?
I'm open to other options, as well.
-wilhelm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 07:45
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 04-Oct 06
From: Groningen - NL
Member No.: 83,850
|
i think t-racks is a very good choice your 'mastering' ...with an easy GUI and have a good (analog) sound ... now a few years is izotope also an good alternate for your mastering.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:17
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 25-Oct 05
From: Kaliningrad - RU
Member No.: 71,671
|
It is common to consider that either way would be flexible enough. Cubase is well fit to handle mastering tasks, and T-Racks is a well respected mastering tool. You might want to chenk out articles on the web regarding mastering in your DAW, like the one at http://www.tweakheadz.com/mastering_your_audio.htm or, of course, SOS archives at www.soundonsound.com. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
