MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Logic Express 7 Or Cubase Sx 3?, Which might be better?
Methanol
post Mon 2 Jan 2006, 21:29
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 15-Dec 05
From: Hamilton - CA
Member No.: 73,959




I've lately been deciding on which sequencer to get for my new Power Mac G5, and I've been considering to get either Logic Express 7 or Cubase SX 3.

I've been hearing a lot that Cubase doesn't run as nicely on Macs as it does on Windows, and that it's not quite as efficient as something like Logic. I am also looking at logic since that I now have a Mac and that gives me the ability to use software that Windows cannot.

Another part of me says that getting the Cubase upgrade from SL to either SL or SX 3 will allow me to stay with Cubase and possibly save a few dollars (with SL). Cubase is still a great program and I have become very comfortable with it.

And then of course I could try and use both but we'll see.

What do you think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Tue 3 Jan 2006, 18:59
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




It true SXs performance is questionable, from my experiece you can use 40%-60% more effects and virtual instruments with apps like Logic, DP4, or Tracktion.

It's not very effecient on anything less than a dual G5, it's not usable.

Because I'm a business, and had to keep working I migrated to logic and haven't looked back.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pmmg
post Tue 3 Jan 2006, 23:41
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939




On my system:

Logic is better at playing VI's with low latency (low buffer settings).

At higher buffer settings I get the same amount of plug's in Logic Pro and SX. But SX can handle more audio tracks than Logic.

(DP is bad at both)

Audio recording and editing is way superior in SX3. I also prefer mixing in SX. (Workflow).
.

Having both is a "dream team" - SX was rewritten from the ground for OSX and WinXP and there was a lot of problems in the beginning. But today SX is a great app on the Mac.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Wed 4 Jan 2006, 22:54
Post #4


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




Sweetwater doesn't think DP has bad performance, I also haven't had bad performance from it like i did with SX.
http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/motu/

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pmmg
post Wed 4 Jan 2006, 23:25
Post #5


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939




I know - Sweetwater love MOTU.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Methanol
post Thu 5 Jan 2006, 05:42
Post #6


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 15-Dec 05
From: Hamilton - CA
Member No.: 73,959




QUOTE (gdoubleyou @ Jan 4 2006, 21:54)
Sweetwater doesn't think DP has bad performance, I also haven't had bad performance from it like i did with SX.
http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/motu/

cool.gif

Which Mac were you running Cubase on?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Thu 5 Jan 2006, 18:57
Post #7


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




At that time it was a brand new 1GHz Powerbook, it basically choked that machine.
I was unable to playback sessions created in cubase 5, that were created on a G4/400.

I ended up putting SX on my PC to transfer my sessions. I did alot of experimenting trying to improve performance, only to be dissapointed. After being a longtime Cubase user I was not confident that Steinberg could deliver on their first try for an OSX app. so I skipped SX1, and upgraded when SX2 came along.

To hedge my bets I purchased DP, and Logic for my OSX transition. I had no problems with sessions of 24-32 tracks, using DP and Logic, on my recently retired G4/400. I also used virtual instruments exclusively for those sessions.

I'm not even going to attempt SX again until I have dual G5, or a mactel.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pmmg
post Thu 5 Jan 2006, 19:10
Post #8


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939




Doesn't change the fact that DP 4.5 performs worse than SX3 - and that Logic is best at low buffer performance.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Methanol
post Thu 5 Jan 2006, 22:09
Post #9


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 15-Dec 05
From: Hamilton - CA
Member No.: 73,959




Well I'm using a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.0 GHz processor, that should definitely defeat any speed problems.

Eckhard Doll from Steinberg said that it wasn't even necessary to get a Power Mac but I got one anyway.

This post has been edited by Methanol: Thu 5 Jan 2006, 22:11
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mojave Mark
post Fri 6 Jan 2006, 05:34
Post #10


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 06-Jan 06
From: Las Vegas - US
Member No.: 74,867




I'm a Logic 7.1 user with a Mac G5 dual 2.3 computer. I would say that you want THE fastest computer you can get if you want to run Logic. I chose it because I know that Apple will fully support it over the years. It has a steep learning curve but it is EXTREMELY complete. Just make sure you have a FAST computer or else there will be weeping and nashing of teeth.

This post has been edited by Mojave Mark: Fri 6 Jan 2006, 05:36
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Welcome Guest
Contribute
Lo-Fi Version - Thu 12 Dec 2024, 21:00
- © PcMusic 1997-2007