|
|
|
Logic Express 7 Or Cubase Sx 3?, Which might be better? |
|
|
|
Tue 3 Jan 2006, 23:41
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939
|
On my system:
Logic is better at playing VI's with low latency (low buffer settings).
At higher buffer settings I get the same amount of plug's in Logic Pro and SX. But SX can handle more audio tracks than Logic.
(DP is bad at both)
Audio recording and editing is way superior in SX3. I also prefer mixing in SX. (Workflow). .
Having both is a "dream team" - SX was rewritten from the ground for OSX and WinXP and there was a lot of problems in the beginning. But today SX is a great app on the Mac.
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 4 Jan 2006, 23:25
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939
|
I know - Sweetwater love MOTU.
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 5 Jan 2006, 05:42
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 15-Dec 05
From: Hamilton - CA
Member No.: 73,959
|
QUOTE (gdoubleyou @ Jan 4 2006, 21:54) Sweetwater doesn't think DP has bad performance, I also haven't had bad performance from it like i did with SX. http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/motu/ Which Mac were you running Cubase on?
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 5 Jan 2006, 18:57
|
Maniac Member
Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002
|
At that time it was a brand new 1GHz Powerbook, it basically choked that machine. I was unable to playback sessions created in cubase 5, that were created on a G4/400. I ended up putting SX on my PC to transfer my sessions. I did alot of experimenting trying to improve performance, only to be dissapointed. After being a longtime Cubase user I was not confident that Steinberg could deliver on their first try for an OSX app. so I skipped SX1, and upgraded when SX2 came along. To hedge my bets I purchased DP, and Logic for my OSX transition. I had no problems with sessions of 24-32 tracks, using DP and Logic, on my recently retired G4/400. I also used virtual instruments exclusively for those sessions. I'm not even going to attempt SX again until I have dual G5, or a mactel.
--------------------
G-Dub
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 5 Jan 2006, 19:10
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 23-Feb 03
From: Mörsil - SE
Member No.: 12,939
|
Doesn't change the fact that DP 4.5 performs worse than SX3 - and that Logic is best at low buffer performance.....
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 5 Jan 2006, 22:09
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 15-Dec 05
From: Hamilton - CA
Member No.: 73,959
|
Well I'm using a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.0 GHz processor, that should definitely defeat any speed problems.
Eckhard Doll from Steinberg said that it wasn't even necessary to get a Power Mac but I got one anyway.
This post has been edited by Methanol: Thu 5 Jan 2006, 22:11
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 05:34
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 06-Jan 06
From: Las Vegas - US
Member No.: 74,867
|
I'm a Logic 7.1 user with a Mac G5 dual 2.3 computer. I would say that you want THE fastest computer you can get if you want to run Logic. I chose it because I know that Apple will fully support it over the years. It has a steep learning curve but it is EXTREMELY complete. Just make sure you have a FAST computer or else there will be weeping and nashing of teeth.
This post has been edited by Mojave Mark: Fri 6 Jan 2006, 05:36
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|