MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ddr Ram, DDR RAM Specs
salparadise99
post Mon 9 Sep 2002, 00:15
Post #1


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 27-Jul 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 6,291




If the computer I am looking at comes with 256MB of DDR SDRAM, does that mean that it actually has 512MB of RAM because DDR RAM is double-sided?

huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
formatj
post Mon 9 Sep 2002, 01:41
Post #2


Moderator
Group Icon

Group: Team
Posts: 508
Joined: 09-Jul 02
From: Sydney - AU
Member No.: 5,658




No
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Mon 9 Sep 2002, 02:24
Post #3


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




unfortunately, it just means that it works more efficiently. angry.gif
also, there are many complaints about apple's implication of ddr currently... unsure.gif


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BusError
post Mon 9 Sep 2002, 09:11
Post #4


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 12-Aug 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 6,795




Yes. the G4 'pipe' to memory is 133Mhz. They've put faster memory (DDR), but the G4s that are in those machines can't exploit it at all.

This is:
1) Marketting; they needed the 'DDR' and a new box on the market
2) Half bred machine; This is obviously a new chassis and motherboard, but they don't have the proper CPU yet

So, IMO, if you can buy a February 2002 2*1Ghz QuickSilver, buy THAT. It's much quieter, will be much cheaper, and has proven to be solid and reliable.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
salparadise99
post Mon 9 Sep 2002, 15:17
Post #5


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 27-Jul 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 6,291




Is 133 fast?

Also, do you know where I can buy a Quicksilver? Are the Quicksilvers comparable in performance though? Do they use the XServe technology?

If I buy a Quicksilver, that means I have to load and also buy Jag right?



laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Tue 10 Sep 2002, 01:12
Post #6


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




these machines were primarily released to show apple to be using a faster system buss/ram. it's the numbers game again! laugh.gif
ironically (new) pc's use a much faster system buss than this. wink.gif
it can be argued that the architecture of the apple buss is superior to the "wintel" buss, but why have i heard that apple are seriously considering using intel processors in the near future?
wintel machines, these days, are not quite the inferior "mutant" brothers of apple that everybody still believes them to be.
apple, these days, is REALLY about the superior operating system. this has never been questionable. cool.gif
on this basis, apple remain the smartest choice for "creative types" like us.
you don't have to use jaguar with any newer mac, and currently, xserve technology definitely supports the "quicksilver" range AND beyond...


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Tue 3 Dec 2024, 10:20
- © MacMusic 1997-2008