MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Quicksilver 933mhz For Audio/midi Recording?
maurice L
post Sat 26 Feb 2005, 00:56
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 26-Feb 05
From: Chicago - US
Member No.: 61,340




Hi All,

About to purchase my first Mac. It's a 933mhz Quicksilver. I am wondering if anyone uses this model for recording, what your experiences are etc.

I guess the main thing I am wondering is how much I can do with this machine before it locks up.

Thanks,

Maurice L
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tomcolliva
post Fri 29 Apr 2005, 23:23
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 29-Apr 05
From: Milano - IT
Member No.: 64,975




Our G4 933 stop to be used in our studio last week (we installed G5 system) after 3 years without any serious problem with a protools mix3 system and very strong use (every day heavy sessions). Very good for us

bye


TC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ohjay
post Mon 2 May 2005, 15:52
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 14-Mar 03
From: Uden - NL
Member No.: 14,357




i've been using a quicksilver 800 mhz since it came out with no problems.
recording and mixing (you'll have to freeze some tracks once in a while and make little use of the spacedesigner).

cheers, jay.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpax
post Mon 2 May 2005, 21:30
Post #4


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 08-Jan 04
From: Oakland - US
Member No.: 32,719




The 933 Quicksilver has been my studio for the last three years. And for reasons I can't recall, was touted as even superior to models that came out right after (even some early duals).

That said, it is still a single processor, and three years old. I've done a lot to keep work flow smooth, like maxing out the memory (1.5 g, depending on the specific model), and placing my audio and samples on separate drives. I also invested in two Firewire PCI cards so that I could stream my external FW devices (including audio and drives) without having a bottle neck. Keep in mind that the two 400 FW ports share the same bus.

Depending on the size of your projects, you may have to bounce VST's, or find that bussing to effects is more efficient. I run all three; Logic Pro, SX3, and Digital Perofrmer 4.5, and track count has never been a big issue for me, though, as Ohjay said, high-end fx, (like reverbs) are a drain. So are some VST's. Again, faster, dedicated drives can speed flow considerably for streaming audio and samples. Unfortunately, VST demands are pushing this machine into obsolecence for what I do, however (upcoming Reaktor 5 specs).

In short, you learn your way around the limitations of the 933, but it will get you far. I've produced several projects, and hope to "node" this machine, or use it still afterwards. I'm rather fond of it, but would love not to worry about limits all the time.

Tiger is running very snappy on this system as well.

pax
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 9 Jun 2024, 19:30
- © 440 Forums 2011